IEG Policy is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

IEG Policy’s June Top 10: US food safety reorganisation, new CAP proposals, WTO tariffs

Trump, Brexit, E.Coli, GMO & soda taxes all featured last month

A proposal to move US food safety programs from the FDA to the USDA took many in the food and drink sector by surprise in June, while the European Commission unveiled its plans for a new post-Brexit Common Agricultural Policy.

The following articles were the most read on IEG Policy last month. Some are free to view for all, while others are restricted to channel subscriptions. Simply select the hyperlink in the headline to open the related content.

If you would like to view articles that are not part of your subscription package, or are a non-subscriber interested in the services provided by IEG Policy, you can now automatically sign up for a 7-day trial by selecting the ‘Free Trial’ option when you open the article.

Should you have any questions, please contact our customer support team via this form or by calling the following telephone numbers:

EMEA: +44 20 701 76242 – Mon-Fri, 9am to 5pm – London

AMERICAS: +1 212 652 5322 – Mon-Fri, 9am to 5pm – New York

Top 10

In case you missed it…

IEG Policy has published new CAP comparison tables outlining the most significant changes proposed by the European Commission for the 2021-27 policy alongside the current CAP for 2015-2020, topic-by-topic.

There are three easy-to-use tables in all, covering Direct Payments, Rural Development and Market Support.

Meanwhile, in the US, Washington law makers have been debating the new US Farm Bill. Late last month, a version of the bill passed through the Senate easily, but a different version only narrowly worked its way through the House, with votes split 213 to 211.

The stage is now set for what is likely to be a tense conference on the two versions of the bill.

Advertisement

Related Content

Topics

What to read next

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PL216900

Ask The Analyst

Please fill in the form below to send over your enquiry or check the Ask The Analyst Page to find out more about the service

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel